不同热集成变压精馏工艺分离乙酸乙酯/正己烷共沸物的优化与控制

doi:10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.219115

过程工程学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (6): 1167-1177.DOI: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.219115

不同热集成变压精馏工艺分离乙酸乙酯/正己烷共沸物的优化与控制

吕利平^1,2，李航²，何树华¹，徐建华¹，李兵^1,3*

1. 长江师范学院化学化工学院，重庆 408100 2. 西南石油大学化学化工学院，四川成都 610500 3. 中化重庆涪陵化工有限公司，重庆 408100

收稿日期:2019-01-11 修回日期:2019-04-15 出版日期:2019-12-22 发布日期:2019-12-22
通讯作者: 李兵 zhhyflb@sina.com
基金资助:
重庆市“科技创新领军人才支持计划”;重庆市社会事业与民生保障科技创新专项项目

Design and control of ethyl acetate/n-hexane azeotropic system separation via different heat-integrated pressure-swing distillation process

Liping LÜ^1,2, Hang LI², Shuhua HE¹, Jianhua XU¹, Bing LI^1,3*

1. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yangtze Normal University, Chongqing 408100, China 2. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China 3. Sinochem Fuling Chongqing Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Chongqing 408100, China

Received:2019-01-11 Revised:2019-04-15 Online:2019-12-22 Published:2019-12-22
Contact: Bing --LI zhhyflb@sina.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于变压精馏分离乙酸乙酯/正己烷共沸体系两塔的温差，利用Aspen Plus软件，以年度总成本最小为目标函数，对部分及完全热集成变压精馏工艺进行了稳态模拟及优化。在此基础上，利用Aspen Dynamics软件开发了多种控制结构，通过引入不同进料流量及组成的扰动测试控制结构的有效性。结果表明，完全热集成变压精馏工艺比部分热集成变压精馏工艺的经济性稍好。动态响应结果表明，部分热集成变压精馏工艺的压力?补偿温度控制结构可有效处理不同程度的干扰，能有效提高控制结构对干扰的响应速度，缩短达到新稳态的时间，保证乙酸乙酯和正己烷产品纯度在99.9wt%之上；而完全热集成变压精馏工艺的组分?温度串级控制结构仅能处理较小的组分和流量干扰，实现稳健控制，无法处理较大的干扰。综合比较两种工艺的经济性和可控性，认为部分热集成变压精馏工艺分离乙酸乙酯/正己烷共沸体系优于完全热集成变压精馏工艺。

关键词: 乙酸乙酯, 正己烷, 热集成, 变压精馏, 控制

Abstract: The azeotropic composition of ethyl-acetate/n-hexane azeotropic system dramatically shifts with pressure. Therefore, this system can be effectively separated by pressure-swing distillation (PSD). In order to save the total annual cost (TAC) and energy, the partially and fully heat-integrated pressure-swing distillation (HIPSD) between condenser and reboiler of two columns were used in this process. The simulation and optimization of different heat-integrated PSD processes were carried out by using Aspen Plus software. The results showed that the energy cost, equipment cost and TAC of the fully HIPSD process had further reductions of 12.24%, 4.38% and 8.60% compared with partially HIPSD process. On the basis of the best optimal process, feed flowrate and composition disturbances with several different degrees were introduced to test the dynamic characteristics of different control structures for partial and fully HIPSD processes by Aspen Dynamics. For partially HIPSD process, three kinds of control structure including basic control structure, proportional control structure and pressure-compensated temperature control structure were developed to test the effectiveness of control structures. The results of the dynamic response showed that the pressure-compensated temperature control structure could handle the feed flowrate and composition disturbances with different degrees and effectively maintain the purity of ethyl acetate and n-hexane products at 99.9wt%. For fully HIPSD process, the composition/temperature cascade control structure could effectively handle the small disturbances (±5% and ±10%) and achieve robust control, but this control structure cannot effectively maintain the product purity of 99.90wt% and realize robust control when subject to ±20% feed and composition disturbances. Compared with the partially HIPSD mode, the fully HIPSD mode could handle much smaller feed flow rate and composition disturbances despite of a little economic benefit. Therefore, the selection of energy-saving modes for the separation process should weigh economy against controllability.

Key words: Ethyl acetate, N-hexane, Heat-integrated, Pressure swing distillation, Control

吕利平李航何树华徐建华李兵. 不同热集成变压精馏工艺分离乙酸乙酯/正己烷共沸物的优化与控制[J]. 过程工程学报, 2019, 19(6): 1167-1177.

Liping Lü Hang LI Shuhua HE Jianhua XU Bing LI. Design and control of ethyl acetate/n-hexane azeotropic system separation via different heat-integrated pressure-swing distillation process[J]. Chin. J. Process Eng., 2019, 19(6): 1167-1177.

参考文献

参考文献
[1] 程能林. 溶剂手册[M]. 第5版. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2015.
[2] 白鹏，朱良伟，李晓峰，等. 正己烷和乙酸乙酯间歇共沸精馏分离共沸剂的研究[J]. 石油化工. 2006, 35(01): 37-41.
[3] 杨金杯，余美琼，郑志功，等. 热集成变压精馏分离乙酸乙酯与乙醇工艺及模拟[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版). 2013(01): 109-114.
[4] Susial P S A R E. Vapor Pressure and VLE Data Measurements on Ethyl Acetate/Ethanol Binary System at 0.1, 0.5, and 0.7 MPa[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan. 2011, 44(3): 155-163.
[5] 黄丽红，韩淑萃. 萃取精馏分离乙酸乙酯和正己烷的过程模拟[J]. 广东化工. 2012, 39(11): 64-65.
[6] 杨文东，袁慎峰，陈志荣，等. 乙酸乙酯—正己烷萃取精馏过程的模拟计算[J]. 计算机与应用化学. 2012, 29(8): 955-958.
[7] 叶青，肖国栋. 共沸精馏分离正已烷和乙酸乙酯的模拟研究[J]. 常州大学学报(自然科学版). 2010, 22(02): 31-33.
[8] 吕利平，李航，李兵，等. 变压精馏分离乙酸乙酯-正己烷共沸物的动态特性[J]. 高校化学工程学报. 2018, 32(02): 478-486.
[9] Lü L, Zhu L, Liu H, et al. Comparison of continuous homogenous azeotropic and pressure-swing distillation for a minimum azeotropic system ethyl acetate/n-hexane separation[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2018, 26(10): 2023-2033.
[10] Luo B, Feng H, Sun D, et al. Control of fully heat-integrated pressure swing distillation for separating isobutyl alcohol and isobutyl acetate[J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification. 2016, 110: 9-20.
[11] Zhang Z, Zhang Q, Li G, et al. Design and control of methyl acetate-methanol separation via heat-integrated pressure-swing distillation[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2016, 24(11): 1584-1599.
[12] Zhu Z, Wang L, Ma Y, et al. Separating an azeotropic mixture of toluene and ethanol via heat integration pressure swing distillation[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering. 2015, 76: 137-149.
[13] Wang Y, Zhang Z, Zhang H, et al. Control of Heat Integrated Pressure-Swing-Distillation Process for Separating Azeotropic Mixture of Tetrahydrofuran and Methanol[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2015, 54(5): 1646-1655.
[14] Luyben W L. Design and Control of a Fully Heat-Integrated Pressure-Swing Azeotropic Distillation System[J].
[15] Luyben W L. Control of a triple-column pressure-swing distillation process[J]. Separation and Purification Technology. 2017, 174: 232-244.
[16] Zhu Z, Xu D, Jia H, et al. Heat Integration and Control of a Triple-Column Pressure-Swing Distillation Process[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2017, 56(8): 2150-2167.
[17] Luyben W L. Comparison of extractive distillation and pressure-swing distillation for acetone/chloroform separation[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering. 2013, 50: 1-7.
[18] Wang Y, Zhang Z, Xu D, et al. Design and control of pressure-swing distillation for azeotropes with different types of boiling behavior at different pressures[J]. Journal of Process Control. 2016, 42: 59-76.
[19] Luyben W L. Distillation Design and Control Using Aspen Simulation[G]. John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
[20] Zhang Z, Zhang Q, Li G, et al. Design and control of methyl acetate-methanol separation via heat-integrated pressure-swing distillation[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2016, 24(11): 1584-1599.
[21] Zhang Q, Peng J, Zhang K. Separation of an azeotropic mixture of dimethyl carbonate and methanol via partial heat integration pressure swing distillation[J]. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2017, 12(1): 50-64.
[22] Cao Y, Li M, Wang Y, et al. Effect of feed temperature on economics and controllability of pressure-swing distillation for separating binary azeotrope[J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification. 2016, 110: 160-171.

不同热集成变压精馏工艺分离乙酸乙酯/正己烷共沸物的优化与控制

Design and control of ethyl acetate/n-hexane azeotropic system separation via different heat-integrated pressure-swing distillation process

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	娄超李铭恽一万德浩杨德明. 四氢呋喃-甲醇-乙酸甲酯-水热集成双溶剂萃取精馏工艺[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(7): 882-890.
[2]	张春花诸林吕利平周倩金仕胜. 变压精馏分离丙酮和环己烷的动态特性[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(2): 249-257.
[3]	谢勇冰张笛赵赫赵月红刘丰强曹宏斌. “双碳”战略下钢铁行业节水减污技术发展的探讨[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(10): 1425-1428.
[4]	刘霄龙朱廷钰. 中国钢铁行业“超低排放”向“减污降碳”过渡的技术思考[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(10): 1360-1367.
[5]	赵月红谢勇冰曹宏斌温浩. 基于全过程污染控制策略的钢铁工业园区水网络全局优化[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(1): 127-134.
[6]	陶芳芳靳海波宁尚雷. 电阻层析成像技术在气液(固)多相流动体系中的应用进展[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(4): 371-381.
[7]	龚傲吴选高喻小强王定纯徐志峰田磊. 选择性还原氨浸从高硅低品位铜钴矿中提取铜、钴的工艺及其浸出动力学[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(10): 1156-1165.
[8]	龙超陈瑞翟持陈飞杨春曦. 微芯片中磁性液滴的生成与操控综述[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(10): 1134-1146.
[9]	王泽利李鑫钢郑成功何林. 工业挥发性有机污染物控制与资源化利用[J]. 过程工程学报, 2019, 19(S1): 35-44.
[10]	刘仕尧黄家玉罗锦洪邓双郭凤艳. 富氧燃烧方式下烟气中SO₃和Hg的排放及控制研究进展[J]. 过程工程学报, 2019, 19(S1): 115-122.
[11]	于荆鑫王菁杨凤玲郝艳红程芳琴. 基于Aspen Plus的燃煤电厂烟气污染控制单元模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2019, 19(2): 329-337.
[12]	吕利平李航李兵徐建华. 甲醇-苯共沸体系变压精馏分离工艺的动态控制[J]. 过程工程学报, 2018, 18(5): 1003-1012.
[13]	赵培李艳王建梅王雪莹许敏王立秋. 利用新型膜乳化器制备粒径均一的PLGA微球[J]. 过程工程学报, 2017, 17(6): 1257-1264.
[14]	柴琴琴林琼斌林双杰. 基于快速粒子群算法的蒸发过程优化控制[J]. 过程工程学报, 2017, 17(3): 539-544.
[15]	丛其然闫鹏. 直拉式单晶炉PDE降维模型的生长界面温度控制[J]. 过程工程学报, 2017, 17(3): 571-577.