能源微藻表面特性对其气浮采收效率的影响

doi:10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.217271

过程工程学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 441-446.DOI: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.217271

• 生化工程 • 上一篇

能源微藻表面特性对其气浮采收效率的影响

沈洲¹，文豪¹，任香萤¹，刘珺¹，杨利伟³，李彦鹏^1,2*

1. 长安大学环境科学与工程学院，陕西西安 710054；2. 长安大学旱区地下水文与生态效应教育部重点实验室，陕西西安 710054； 3. 长安大学建筑工程学院，陕西西安 710061

收稿日期:2017-07-05 修回日期:2017-08-27 出版日期:2018-04-22 发布日期:2018-04-10
通讯作者: 李彦鹏 liyanp01@chd.edu.cn
基金资助:
旱区地表- - -地下水系统界面动力学与水循环研究;可控条件下建筑环境渐近相似模拟与实验研究;绿色浮选及能源化;能源微藻气浮采收体系中气-液-固三相相互作用的物理化学机制

Influences of Surface Characteristics of Energy Microalgae on Its Harvesting Performance by Air Flotation

Zhou SHEN¹, Hao WEN¹, Xiangying REN¹, Jun LIU¹, Liwei YANG³, Yanpeng LI^1,2*

1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Chang?an University, Xi?an, Shaanxi 710054, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Subsurface Hydrology and Ecology in Arid Areas, Chang?an University, Xi?an, Shaanxi 710054, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Chang?an University, Xi?an, Shaanxi 710061, China

Received:2017-07-05 Revised:2017-08-27 Online:2018-04-22 Published:2018-04-10
Contact: LI Yan-peng liyanp01@chd.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选取小球藻与鱼腥藻为代表藻种，结合微藻的表面特性与XDLVO理论，研究了影响微藻浮选采收的关键因素，根据微藻表面的电负性，用阳离子表面活性剂C16TAB浮选两种藻. 结果表明，pH为4?10时，两种藻的Zeta电位在?6.72??15.01 mV之间，均显电负性；小球藻的黏附自由能为1.21 mJ/m2，显亲水性，鱼腥藻的黏附自由能为?55.85 mJ/m2，显疏水性. 相同条件下，疏水性的鱼腥藻回收率始终高于亲水性的小球藻. 小球藻和鱼腥藻在Zeta电位最大的pH处(分别为7和8)富集比最高(分别为12.45和1.3)，而回收率在pH=10时最高，表明由于液膜的排液行为，回收率和富集比无法同时达到最大值. C16TAB对微藻表面疏水性有修饰作用，加入80 mg/L C16TAB后，小球藻疏水率从19%提高到64%，回收率提高了67.38%.

关键词: 生物质能源, 微藻, 表面特性, 浮选, 疏水性

Abstract: Two algal species Chlorella vulgaris and Anabaena vasriabilis were chosen as typical energy microalgae to investigate the surface characteristics of microaglae. The surface potential and hydrophobicity was examined based on the extend XDLVO theory. According to the Zeta potential, hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (C16TAB) was used as cationic surfactant for flotation. The results showed that both two strains carried with negative charge, and free energy of cohesion for C. vulgaris was 1.21 mJ/m2, and ?55.85 mJ/m2 for A. varsriabilis, which meant hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity respectively. A. varsriabilis performed better harvesting rate than C. vulgaris. The maximums concentration factor (12.45 for C. vulgaris and 1.3 for A. varsriabilis) toped at the pH which charged most negatively (pH=7 for C. vulgaris and pH=9 for A. varsriabilis). Nevertheless, harvesting rate toped at pH=10, which meant it could not reach the maximum with the concentration factor in the same condition, may owing to the drainage of the tonoplast. Meanwhile, after adding 80 mg/L C16TAB into the algal solution, the hydrophobicity rate for C. vulgaris raised from 19% to 64%, and the harvesting rate increased by 67.38%.

Key words: Biomass energy, Microalgae, Surface characteristics, Harvesting performance, Hydrophobicity

沈洲文豪任香萤刘珺杨利伟李彦鹏. 能源微藻表面特性对其气浮采收效率的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2018, 18(2): 441-446.

Zhou SHEN Hao WEN Xiangying REN Jun LIU Liwei YANG Yanpeng LI. Influences of Surface Characteristics of Energy Microalgae on Its Harvesting Performance by Air Flotation[J]. Chin. J. Process Eng., 2018, 18(2): 441-446.

参考文献

[1] Seo Y H, Park D, Oh Y K, et al.Harvesting of microalgae cell using oxidized dye wastewater[J].Bioresource Technology, 2015, (192):802-806
[2]Kenny P, Flynn K J.In silico optimization for production of biomass and biofuel feedstocks from microalgae[J].Journal of Applied Phycology, 2015, 27(1):33-48
[3]Koberg M.Optimization of bio-diesel production from oils,cooking oils,microalgae,and castor and jatropha seeds: probing various heating sources and catalysts[J].Energy & Environmental Science, 2012, 5(6):7460-7469
[4]Spiden E M, Yap B H J, Hill D R A, et al.Quantitative evaluation of the ease of rupture of industrially promising microalgae by high pressure homogenization[J].Bioresource Technology, 2013, 140(3):165-171
[5]Milledge J J, Heaven S.A review of the harvesting of micro-algae for biofuel production[J].Reviews in Environmental Science and BioTechnology, 2013, 12(2):165-178
[6]Wu Z, Zhu Y, Huang W, et al.Evaluation of flocculation induced by pH increase for harvesting microalgae and reuse of flocculated medium[J].Bioresource technology, 2012, 110(2):496-502
[7]Prochazkova G, Safarik I, Branyik T.Harvesting microalgae with microwave synthesized magnetic microparticles[J].Bioresource Technology, 2013, 130(1):472-477
[8]Coward T, Lee J G M, Caldwell G S.Development of a foam flotation system for harvesting microalgae biomass[J].Algal Research, 2013, 2(2):135-144
[9]Ozkan A, Berberoglu H.Physico-chemical surface properties of microalgae[J].Colloids & Surfaces B Biointerfaces, 2013, 112(3):287-293
[10]Garg S, Wang L, Schenk P M.Effective harvesting of low surface-hydrophobicity microalgae by froth flotation[J].Bioresource Technology, 2014, 159(2):437-441
[11] Fowkes F M.Contact angle, wettability, and adhesion[M]// Contact angle, wettability and adhesion :. American Chemical Society, 1964:888-892.
[12]Rosenberg M, Gutnick D, Rosenberg E.Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: A simple method for measuring cell-surface hydrophobicity[J].Fems Microbiology Letters, 1980, 9(1):29-33
[13]陈家长, 王菁, 裘丽萍, 等.对鱼腥藻和普通小球藻生长竞争的影响[J].生态环境学报, 2014, 42(2):316-320
[14]欧阳峥嵘, 温小斌, 耿亚红, 等.光照强度、温度、、盐度对小球藻光合作用的影响[J].植物科学学报, 2010, 28(1):49-55
[15]Eroglu, Melis, Anastasios.Extracellular terpenoid hydrocarbon extraction and quantitation from the green microalgae Botryococcus braunii varShowa[J].Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(7):2359-2366
[16]Callow M E, Callow J A, Ista L K, et al.Use of self-assembled monolayers of different wettabilities to study surface selection and primary adhesion processes of green algal (Enteromorpha) zoospores[J].Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 2000, 66(8):3249-3254
[17]A.F. Toussaint,PELuner,The wetting properties of grafted cellulose films[J].Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 1993, 7(6):635-648
[18]孟顺龙, 王菁, 裘丽萍, 等.氮磷质量浓度对普通小球藻和鱼腥藻生长竞争的影响[J].生态环境学报, 2015, 5(4):658-664
[19]Pi?eres J, Barraza J.Energy barrier of aggregates coal particle–bubble through the extended DLVO theory[J].International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2011, 100(1):14-20
[20]Coward T, Lee J G M, Caldwell G S.Harvesting microalgae by CTAB-aided foam flotation increases lipid recovery and improves fatty acid methyl ester characteristics[J].Biomass & Bioenergy, 2014, 67(9):354-362
[21] Zhao Y, Li Y P, Huang J, et al.Rebound and attachment involving single bubble and particle in the separation of plastics by froth flotation[J].Separation & Purification Technology, 2015, (144):123-132

能源微藻表面特性对其气浮采收效率的影响

Influences of Surface Characteristics of Energy Microalgae on Its Harvesting Performance by Air Flotation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘宗浩史清洪. 聚合物接枝对脂肪酶活性及稳定性的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(4): 506-514.
[2]	李明阳陈泽廉德高翔鹏龙红明童雄. 铁矿石浮选调整剂的研究进展[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 21(9): 1003-1011.
[3]	李凌, 丁磊, 薛岗, 贾韫翰, 钟梅英, 张德伟. 不同亲疏水性腐殖酸对磁性离子交换树脂吸附去除水中溴离子的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 21(7): 807-816.
[4]	杨波童雄王晓解永刚谢贤. 从云南某高硫铅锌矿尾矿中综合回收锌的试验研究[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 21(6): 704-712.
[5]	李明阳廉德郝军杰胡义明高翔鹏 . 水中Ca²⁺和Mg²⁺对镜铁矿和绿泥石可浮性的影响机理[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(8): 959-969.
[6]	代国强汤晶刘雯谭淑君刘斌王文庆刘天中苏革. 环氧树脂涂层表面亲水性对微藻黏附性能的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(7): 832-842.
[7]	马麟邓荣东幸鼎权陈泓希范兴颖黄汀怡. 硫酸溶液中方解石表面CO₂气泡的生长过程[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(2): 222-229.
[8]	刘明宝郭万中田思雨陈梅. 油酸钠与苯甲羟肟酸钠协同体系中金红石的浮选机理[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(11): 1296-1303.
[9]	韩继康王伟之张伟单志伟王东 . 浮选设备流体力学特征参数研究现状[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(10): 1121-1133.
[10]	王艺璇颜成虎丛威. 塑料薄膜材料在微藻培养环境中的稳定性和生物附着行为[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(1): 74-83.
[11]	王宇斌文堪王望泊. 柠檬酸对白云母可浮性的抑制机理[J]. 过程工程学报, 2019, 19(2): 338-344.
[12]	马英强盛秋月李有多唐浪峰. 晶体化学在氧化铜矿物浮选中的应用研究进展[J]. 过程工程学报, 2018, 18(5): 924-933.
[13]	邹小彤徐开伟文豪任香萤沈洲李彦鹏. 能源微藻无泡采收新方法及其性能[J]. 过程工程学报, 2018, 18(4): 872-878.
[14]	蔡锦鹏宋凯伟申培伦李健民刘殿文. 滇东某多金属氧化铅锌矿高效回收选矿工艺[J]. 过程工程学报, 2018, 18(3): 612-617.
[15]	李佳磊宋凯伟刘殿文章晓林李健民敖顺福. 闪锌矿浮选的活化与去活化研究进展[J]. 过程工程学报, 2018, 18(1): 11-19.