升温速率对CO2在13X分子筛上脱附性能的影响

doi:10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.217229

过程工程学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1): 88-95.DOI: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.217229

升温速率对CO2在13X分子筛上脱附性能的影响

郭亚楼¹，张辉^2*，刘应书¹，赵梓伶¹，张宣凯¹，李东¹

1. 北京科技大学能源与环境工程学院，北京 100083；2. 北京科技大学冶金工业节能减排北京市重点实验室，北京 100083

收稿日期:2017-05-03 修回日期:2017-06-15 出版日期:2018-02-22 发布日期:2018-01-29
通讯作者: 张辉. zhanghui56@ustb.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家高技术研究发展计划项目;中央高校基本科研业务专项资金

Impact of Heating Rate on Desorption Performance of CO2 Attached to 13X Zeolite

Yalou GUO¹, Hui ZHANG^2*, Yingshu LIU¹, Ziling ZHAO¹, Xuankai ZHANG¹, Dong LI¹

1. School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction for Metallurgical Industry, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2017-05-03 Revised:2017-06-15 Online:2018-02-22 Published:2018-01-29
Contact: ZHANG Hui zhanghui56@ustb.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用程序升温脱附技术研究了升温速率对CO2在13X上脱附性能的影响，基于Polanyi?Wigner方程在无假定条件的情况下计算了不同升温速率下的脱附活化能(Ed). 结果表明，13X分子筛在常温下吸附CO2后，脱附时会产生两个脱附峰(低温峰和高温峰)；改变升温速率?会影响Ed，随?升高，低温峰的脱附活化能Ed,L呈对数规律减小，高温峰的脱附活化能Ed,H基本不变，且Ed,L<Ed,H，无假设情况下Ed的计算结果比升温速率变化法计算结果更具合理性和准确性；吸附量相同时，随?升高，CO2的低温脱附量Qd,L逐渐增大而高温脱附量Qd,H逐渐减小，且Qd,L>>Qd,H；物理吸附与化学吸附作用力的差异造成两峰吸脱附机理存在根本差别.

关键词: TPD, 升温速率, 脱附活化能, 脱附量, 脱附双峰, 二氧化碳, 13X分子筛

Abstract: Temperature programmed desorption (TDP) was used to investigate the impact of heating rate on desorption performance of CO2 attached to 13X zeolite. Based on the Polanyi?Wigner equation, the desorption activation energy Ed under different heating rates was calculated without any assumed conditions. The results showed that two desorption peaks on TPD curve were produced while heating 13X molecular sieve full of CO2 at room temperature, one was located at low temperature, called as low-temperature peak, the other was at high temperature, called as high-temperature peak. Ed changed with ?. The low-temperature peak related to the desorption activation energy Ed,L decreased logarithmically with respect to increasing ?, while Ed,H remained the same, and the value of Ed,L was smaller than that of Ed,H. So Ed calculated without assumptions were more reasonable and accurate than the value calculated by variable heating rate method. For the same adsorption capacity, desorption capacity of CO2 called Qd,L at low temperature increased gradually with the growth of ?, while Qd,H at high temperature decreased, and Qd,L was far greater than Qd,H. The different acting force of physisorption and chemisorption was the key factor that resulted in a difference between high-temperature peak and low-temperature peak on adsorption mechanism.

Key words: TPD, heating rate, desorption activation energy, desorption amount, desorption double-peak, carbon dioxide, 13X zeolite

郭亚楼张辉刘应书赵梓伶张宣凯李东. 升温速率对CO2在13X分子筛上脱附性能的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2018, 18(1): 88-95.

Yalou GUO Hui ZHANG Yingshu LIU Ziling ZHAO Xuankai ZHANG Dong LI. Impact of Heating Rate on Desorption Performance of CO2 Attached to 13X Zeolite[J]. Chin. J. Process Eng., 2018, 18(1): 88-95.

参考文献

[1] Zhang Zhongzheng(张中正).Adsorptive Separartion of Carbon Dioxide[D].Tianjin：Tianjin University(天津大学)，2012
[2] Liu Lu(刘露),Duan Zhenhong(段振红),He Gaohong (贺高红).Compared and advance of the natural gas CO2 removal method[J].Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress(化工进展)，2009,28:290-292
[3] Li Xiang (李湘), Li Zhong (李忠), Luo Ling’ai (罗灵爱). New TPD model for activation energy estimation [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China) (化工学报), 2006, 57(2): 258-262.
[4] Xi Hongxia, Li Zhong, Zhang Haibing, Li Xiang, Hu Xijun. Estimation of activation energy for desorption of low-volatility dioxins on zeolites by TPD technique [J]. Sep. Purif. Technol.,2003, 31(1): 41-45.
[5] Poston M J, Grieves G A, Dyar M D, et al. Temperature Program Desorption Measurements of Water Molecules on Lunar Samples 12001 and 72501[C]// Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 2014:2283.
[6] Becker K E, Mignogna M H, Fichthorn K A. Accelerated molecular dynamics of temperature-programed desorption.[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2009, 102(4):046101-046101.
[7] Biache C, Mansuy-Huault L, Faure P, Munier-Lamy C, Leyval C.Effects of thermal desorption on the composition of two coking plant soils: impact on solvent extractable organic compounds and metal bioavailability[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2008, 156(3): 671-677.
[8] Харламов В.В.,Богомолов В.М.,Мирзабаев Н.В.идр.Журн. физ. химии. 1976.50(2).343.
[9] Tokoro Y, Misono M, Uchijima T, et al. Analysis of Thermal Desorption Curves for Heterogeneous Surfaces. I. A Linear Variation of the Activation Energy of Desorption[J]. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 1978, 51:85-89.
[10] Falconer J L, Madix R J. Desorption rate isotherms in flash desorption analysis[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 1977, 48(s 1–3):262-268.
[11] Yang Shagnrun(杨上闰).Theoretical analysis of TPD spectrogram of first order desorption kinetics[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis (催化学报),1983,4(1):57-65.
[12] Duan Xue（段雪）. The study and application of temperature programmed dymamic analysis in heterogeneous catalysis and other fields[D]. Beijing：Beijing Institute of Chemical Technology(北京化工学院),1988.
[13] Na B K, Lee H, Koo K K, et al. Effect of Rinse and Recycle Methods on the Pressure Swing Adsorption Process To Recover CO2 from Power Plant Flue Gas Using Activated Carbon[J]. Ind.eng.chem.res, 2002, 41(22):5498-5503.
[14] Gomes V G, Yee K W K. Pressure swing adsorption for carbon dioxide sequestration from exhaust gases[J]. Separation & Purification Technology, 2002, 28(2):161-171.
[15] Siriwardane R V, Shen M S, Fisher E P, et al. Adsorption of CO2 on zeolites at moderate temperatures[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2005, 19(3): 1153-1159.
[16] Cavenati S, Grande C A, Rodrigues A E. Removal of carbon dioxide from natural gas by vacuum pressure swing adsorption[J]. Energy & fuels, 2006, 20(6): 2648-2659.
[17] Hu Yunxing.A method for calculating kinetic parameters [J] .Shiyou Huagong(石油化工),1986,15(3):167-170.
[18] Cvetanovi?R J, Amenomiya Y. A temperature programmed desorption technique for investigation of practical catalysts [J]. Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng.,1972, 6(1): 21-48.
[19] Pan Hongyan (潘红艳), Li Zhong (李忠), Xia Qibin (夏启斌), Xi Hongxia (奚红霞), Li Jing (李晶), Qian Yu (钱宇). Effect of metalions loaded onto activated carbons on desorption activation energy of dichloromethane [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (化工学报),2007,58(9): 2259-2265.
[20] Xin L, Xiao C, Zhong L. Adsorption Equilibrium And Desorption Activation Energy Of Water Vapor On Activated Carbon Modified By An Oxidation And Reduction Treatment[J]. J.chem.eng.data, 2010, 55(9):3164-3169.
[21] Bai Sihong(白四红),Chen Tong(陈彤),Qi Zhifu(祁志福),Liu Jie(刘洁);Lu Shengyong(陆胜勇),Bo Zheng(薄拯),LI Xiaodong(李晓东).Effect of carrier gas flow rate and heating rate on thermal desorption of polychlorinated biphenyls in contaminated soil[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (化工学报),2014,65(6):2256-2262.
[22] Yang Xiyao(杨锡尧). Research methods of solid catalyst[J]. Petrochemical Technology（石油化工），2001,30(12)：952-960.

升温速率对CO2在13X分子筛上脱附性能的影响

Impact of Heating Rate on Desorption Performance of CO2 Attached to 13X Zeolite

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	靳波张亚新. 颗粒尺度下混合催化剂床层中CO₂加氢反应体系数值模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(8): 1040-1052.
[2]	胡启鲁, 赵国英, 于彩虹. 烯烃和CO₂直接合成环状碳酸酯的催化剂研究进展[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 21(7): 762-773.
[3]	张卫风李娟王秋华. 响应面法优化解吸MDEA/PG富液中CO₂再生工艺[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 21(3): 353-362.
[4]	郭艳东贺艳静张晓春. 离子液体-氧化石墨烯膜材料在CO₂分离领域的研究进展[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 21(12): 1373-1382.
[5]	周玥郭晓晶李宣江高璐洪枫乔锦丽. 不同浸渍时间对CuO/Cu@BC电极催化CO₂还原性能的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(8): 989-996.
[6]	孙灵诸林何阳东. 基于链式循环二氧化碳重整的甲烷制甲醇过程火用分析[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(7): 822-831.
[7]	刘佳慧刘会婷赵国英孙振宇. 离子液体自模板合成多孔碳氮材料及其对二氧化碳的吸附[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(1): 108-115.
[8]	李金平李洋姚泽张学民黄娟娟康健. 初始压力对冰冻石英砂中CO₂水合物生成特性的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2019, 19(1): 216-222.
[9]	李艳于光林汪诚文. 沼气变压吸附剂吸附性能比较[J]. 过程工程学报, 2018, 18(2): 301-307.
[10]	袁聪聪王宇栋张丁川杨斌戴永年. 木屑颗粒热解过程动力学计算及热解气体分析[J]. 过程工程学报, 2017, 17(5): 1102-1108.
[11]	潘卢伟戴方钦黄建宁刘爽. 石长沟油页岩的热解特性及动力学[J]. 过程工程学报, 2015, 15(6): 1044-1048.
[12]	李露王晓春杨冬伟王琴施锦. CO2在四丁基高氯酸铵-碳酸丙烯酯溶液中的电催化还原[J]. 过程工程学报, 2015, 15(5): 837-841.
[13]	张贺张辉. 刘应书郝智天赵梓伶郭亚楼. 二乙醇胺溶液吸收CO2过程[J]. 过程工程学报, 2015, 15(5): 774-780.
[14]	冯妙娜盖健楠赵国英高洪苓张锁江. 软模板法用壳聚糖制备富氮多孔碳材料[J]. 过程工程学报, 2015, 15(3): 536-540.
[15]	王晓春李露杨冬伟王琴施锦. Au和Ag电极上CO2电还原反应的动力学特征对比[J]. , 2014, 14(6): 961-966.