焦化联合生产模式的物质流-价值流耦合分析

doi:10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.217263

过程工程学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 343-349.DOI: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.217263

焦化联合生产模式的物质流-价值流耦合分析

刘文涛^1,2，李强^1*，张文娟¹，李会泉^1,2，石靖靖¹

1. 中国科学院过程工程研究所绿色过程与工程重点实验室，湿法冶金清洁生产技术国家工程实验室，北京 100190； 2. 中国科学院大学化学与化工学院，北京 100049

收稿日期:2017-06-23 修回日期:2017-08-31 出版日期:2018-04-22 发布日期:2018-04-10
通讯作者: 李强 carl@ipe.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目;国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目

Comprehensive Analysis of Material and Value Flow of Joint Production Modes of Cokes

Wentao LIU^1,2, Qiang LI^1*, Wenjuan ZHANG¹, Huiquan LI^1,2, Jingjing SHI¹

1. Key Laboratory of Green Process Engineering, National Engineering Laboratory of Clean Production Technology of Hydrometallurgy, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; 2. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

Received:2017-06-23 Revised:2017-08-31 Online:2018-04-22 Published:2018-04-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对复杂市场环境下4种典型焦化生产模式的优选问题，建立了物质流与价值流耦合模型，分析了不同情景下4种模式的物质输入输出及相应的价值流转过程，比较了资源增值效率指标. 结果表明，液化天然气油苯加工模式的增值效率在历史情景下比其它模式高3%~10%；产业链延伸增值效率为焦油粗苯分离出萘?纯苯(32%)?焦炉煤气制液化天然气(21%)?焦炉煤气制甲醇(1%). 在经济上行状态的虚拟情景下，焦炉煤气制甲醇比其它措施增值效率高36%~50%.

关键词: 焦化, 模式, 物质流, 价值流, 情景分析

Abstract: A coupled model of material flow and value flow was established to solve the selection problem of four typical coking modes under complex market environment. The input and output of the four modes and the corresponding value transfer process in different scenarios were analyzed, and the indicator of resource-added efficiency were compared. The results showed that the value-added efficiency of liquefied natural Gas (LNG)?tar?benzene processing mode was 3%~10% higher than that of other modes in historical scenarios. The descending order of added efficiency of the industrial chain extension were naphthalene and benzene separated from tar and crude benzene (32%), LNG from coke oven gas (21%), methanol from coke oven gas (1%). However, in the virtual scenario of upward economic status, the value-added efficiency of methanol from coke oven gas was 36%~50% higher than other measures.

Key words: coking, mode, material flow, value flow, scenario analysis

刘文涛李强张文娟李会泉石靖靖. 焦化联合生产模式的物质流-价值流耦合分析[J]. 过程工程学报, 2018, 18(2): 343-349.

Wentao LIU Qiang LI Wenjuan ZHANG Huiquan LI Jingjing SHI. Comprehensive Analysis of Material and Value Flow of Joint Production Modes of Cokes[J]. Chin. J. Process Eng., 2018, 18(2): 343-349.

参考文献

[1] 杨文彪.我国焦炭行业现状及市场供需趋势 [J]. 煤炭加工与综合利用, 2016, (8): 8-13[J].煤炭加工与综合利用, 2016, (8):8-13 [2]任云亮, 贺鹏等.典型独立焦化过程资源价值流计算与分析[J].计算机与应用化学, 2015, 32(7):777-782 [3]马丁.经济新常态下中国中长期能源展望[J].环境与可持续发展, 2017, 42(1):26-28 [4] Brunner P.H, Rechberger H. Practical Handbook of Material Flow Analysis [M]. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers, 2004: 3. [5]Moeller, A.Material and Energy Flow-Based Cost Accounting[J].Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2010, 33(4):567-572 [6]Henningsson S, Hyde K, Smith A, et al.The value of resource efficiency in the food industry: a waste minimisation project in East Anglia,UK[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2004, 12(5):505-512 [7] 卜庆才.物质流分析及其在钢铁工业中的应用 [D]. 沈阳：东北大学, 2005: 36-39. [8]Harper E M.A Product-Level Approach to Historical Material Flow Analysis[J].Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2008, 12(5-6):768-784 [9]陈吕军, 田金平, 赵远等.杭州湾精细化工园区碳的物质流分析研究[J].环境污染与防治, 2009, 31(12):80-83 [10]郭颖, 胡山鹰, 陈定江等.元素流分析在生态工业规划中的应用[J].过程工程学报, 2008, 8(2):321-326 [11]杨宁, 陈定江, 胡山鹰等.中国氯元素工业代谢分析[J].过程工程学报, 2009, 9(1):69-73 [12]毛建素, 陆钟武.物质循环流动与价值循环流动[J].材料与冶金学报, 2003, 2(2):157-160 [13] 燕凌羽.中国铁资源物质流和价值流综合分析 [D]. 北京：中国地质大学, 2013: 91-93. [14] Yan L Y, Wang A J.Based on material flow analysis: Value chain analysis of China iron resources [J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2014, (91): 52-61.[J].Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2014, (91):52-61 [15]肖序, 张倩.氨醇联产企业的资源价值流分析[J].化工进展, 2014, 33(2):263-271 [16] 曾绍伦, 杨素琼.燃煤电厂循环经济评价指标体系研究 [J]. 生态经济, 2009, (11): 115~119.[J].生态经济, 2009, (11):115-119 [17]张文娟, 王宝, 刘青等.钢厂能耗分析与评价的研究进展[J].过程工程学报, 2011, 11(3):533-540 [18]肖序, 陈宝玉.基于资源效率的“元素流-价值流”分析方法研究[J].环境污染与防治, 2015, 37(12):90-95 [19]Jasch C.The use of environmental management accounting(EMA)for identifying environmental costs[J].Cleaner Production, 2003, 11(6):667-676 [20]罗喜英, 高瑜琴.资源价值流分析在循环经济“”原则中的运用[J].生态经济, 2015, 31(9):43-47 [21] 冀发改价格〔2014〕1717号— —《关于调整排污费收费标准等有关问题的通知》[EB/OL].[2014-12-15]. http://www.hebei.gov.cn/hebei/11937442/10757006/10757172/12324314/index.html. [22]刘宗宽.煤焦油加氢精制和加氢裂化催化剂的研究进展[J].化工进展, 2012, 31(12):2672-2677 [23]Yu Q, Yi M, Peng L, et al.Integrated Process of Coke-Oven Gas Tr-Reforming and Coal Gasification to Methanol with High Carbon Utilization and Energy Efficiency[J].Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 38(9):775-780

焦化联合生产模式的物质流-价值流耦合分析

Comprehensive Analysis of Material and Value Flow of Joint Production Modes of Cokes

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王新东侯长江田京雷. 钢铁行业烟气多污染物协同控制技术应用实践[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(9): 997-1007.
[2]	丁睿王德武刘燕张少峰张伟赵立军. 提升管加床层反应器不同操作模式下的压力脉动特性[J]. 过程工程学报, 2016, 16(5): 721-729.
[3]	刘洪斌肖慧娜李萍瑛穆伟涛. 基于四参数流变模式的旋流分离流场特性分析[J]. 过程工程学报, 2016, 16(2): 181-188.
[4]	邱淑兴张生富张溪杨明睿刘伟. 煤焦化过程中矿相转变规律[J]. , 2015, 15(2): 278-283.
[5]	罗国华徐新. 氯铝酸盐离子液体催化焦化碳九聚合制备苯并呋喃-茚树脂[J]. , 2013, 13(3): 505-511.
[6]	陈小娥方旭波余辉夏文水. 曲霉产壳聚糖酶的水解作用模式[J]. , 2008, 8(2): 350-354.
[7]	付志新;郭占成;王申祥. 高硫煤焦化过程气体返回耦合脱硫实验研究[J]. , 2007, 7(5): 910-915.
[8]	李刚;李小森;唐良广;冯自平;樊栓狮;张郁. 降温模式对甲烷水合物形成的影响[J]. , 2007, 7(4): 723-727.
[9]	吴春亮;詹杰民. 气固流化床内鼓泡行为的离散颗粒数值模拟[J]. , 2007, 7(3): 432-438.
[10]	曹新波;汤志刚;段占庭;袁乃驹. 乙烯急冷-延迟焦化集成节能流程[J]. , 2006, 6(2): 267-271.
[11]	张文艺. 微电解–SBR活性污泥法处理焦化废水[J]. , 2003, 3(5): 0-0.
[12]	禹争光;杨邦朝;卢云. 球形氧化铋粉料的合成[J]. , 2003, 3(3): 0-0.
[13]	徐新;罗国华;张国英;杨春育;郭新闻. 焦化苯中噻吩在酸性沸石催化剂上的催化裂解性能[J]. , 2001, 1(4): 0-0.