欢迎访问过程工程学报, 今天是

过程工程学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 258-264.DOI: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.217238

• 流动与传递 • 上一篇    下一篇

浆态床内固含率轴向分布的数值模拟

史书舟1,2周荣涛2,32*宋健斐1   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学(北京)化学工程学院,北京 102249;2. 中国科学院过程工程研究所,北京 100190;3. 中国科学院大学化学科学学院,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-19 修回日期:2017-07-04 出版日期:2018-04-22 发布日期:2018-04-10
  • 通讯作者: 史书舟 shdshi@ipe.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年项目;国家自然科学基金青年项目;中国科学院国际合作局 对外合作重点项目

Simulation of Axial Solid Holdup in Slurry Bubble Columns

Shuzhou SHI1,2,  Rongtao ZHOU2,3,  Ning YANG2*,  Jianfei SONG1   

  1. 1. College of Chemical Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China; 2. Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; 3. School of Chemical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2017-05-19 Revised:2017-07-04 Online:2018-04-22 Published:2018-04-10

摘要: 采用DBS曳力模型计算气液相间作用,分别采用Gidaspow曳力模型、经Brucato修正的Gidaspow曳力模型和Schiller?Naumann曳力模型计算液固相间作用,忽略气固间的直接作用,对比了浆态床内不同颗粒粒径体系轴向固含率的模拟和实验结果. 结果表明,不同液固相间曳力模型对气含率的预测影响不大;在颗粒粒径较大(140 ?m)的体系中,较低表观气速下气液DBS与液固Schiller?Naumann曳力模型组合模拟的固含率随床高度增加而减小,与实验结果吻合,而其它曳力模型组合的模拟结果较差,轴向分布较均匀;在颗粒粒径较小(35 ?m)的体系中,几种曳力模型组合的模拟结果均与实验结果吻合较好,轴向分布较均匀.

关键词: 计算流体力学, 浆态床, 曳力模型, 固相浓度

Abstract: DBS drag model for gas?liquid interaction, and three drag models for liquid?solid interaction including Gidaspow model, Gidaspow?Brucato model and Schiller?Naumann model were used to simulate slurry bubble columns without considering the direct interaction between gas and solid. The simulation and experimental results of axial solid holdup with different particle sizes were compared. The results showed that different liquid?solid drag models had minor influence on the prediction of gas holdup. The combination of DBS drag model and Schiller?Naumann model had a better prediction for the systems of larger particle size (140 ?m) at lower gas velocity. The solids holdup decreased with increasing the column height, whereas other models fail to predict the axial solids holdup distribution. These different liquid?solid drag models performed well for the systems of smaller particle size (35 ?m).

Key words: CFD, slurry bubble column, drag model, solids holdup