浆态床内固含率轴向分布的数值模拟

doi:10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.217238

过程工程学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 258-264.DOI: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.217238

浆态床内固含率轴向分布的数值模拟

史书舟^{1,2，周荣涛^{2,3，杨宁^{2*，宋健斐¹}}}

1. 中国石油大学(北京)化学工程学院，北京 102249；2. 中国科学院过程工程研究所，北京 100190；3. 中国科学院大学化学科学学院，北京 100049

收稿日期:2017-05-19 修回日期:2017-07-04 出版日期:2018-04-22 发布日期:2018-04-10
通讯作者: 史书舟 shdshi@ipe.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目;国家自然科学基金青年项目;中国科学院国际合作局对外合作重点项目

Simulation of Axial Solid Holdup in Slurry Bubble Columns

Shuzhou SHI^1,2, Rongtao ZHOU^2,3, Ning YANG^2*, Jianfei SONG¹

1. College of Chemical Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China; 2. Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; 3. School of Chemical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2017-05-19 Revised:2017-07-04 Online:2018-04-22 Published:2018-04-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用DBS曳力模型计算气液相间作用，分别采用Gidaspow曳力模型、经Brucato修正的Gidaspow曳力模型和Schiller?Naumann曳力模型计算液固相间作用，忽略气固间的直接作用，对比了浆态床内不同颗粒粒径体系轴向固含率的模拟和实验结果. 结果表明，不同液固相间曳力模型对气含率的预测影响不大；在颗粒粒径较大(140 ?m)的体系中，较低表观气速下气液DBS与液固Schiller?Naumann曳力模型组合模拟的固含率随床高度增加而减小，与实验结果吻合，而其它曳力模型组合的模拟结果较差，轴向分布较均匀；在颗粒粒径较小(35 ?m)的体系中，几种曳力模型组合的模拟结果均与实验结果吻合较好，轴向分布较均匀.

关键词: 计算流体力学, 浆态床, 曳力模型, 固相浓度

Abstract: DBS drag model for gas?liquid interaction, and three drag models for liquid?solid interaction including Gidaspow model, Gidaspow?Brucato model and Schiller?Naumann model were used to simulate slurry bubble columns without considering the direct interaction between gas and solid. The simulation and experimental results of axial solid holdup with different particle sizes were compared. The results showed that different liquid?solid drag models had minor influence on the prediction of gas holdup. The combination of DBS drag model and Schiller?Naumann model had a better prediction for the systems of larger particle size (140 ?m) at lower gas velocity. The solids holdup decreased with increasing the column height, whereas other models fail to predict the axial solids holdup distribution. These different liquid?solid drag models performed well for the systems of smaller particle size (35 ?m).

Key words: CFD, slurry bubble column, drag model, solids holdup

史书舟周荣涛杨宁宋健斐. 浆态床内固含率轴向分布的数值模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2018, 18(2): 258-264.

Shuzhou SHI Rongtao ZHOU Ning YANG Jianfei SONG. Simulation of Axial Solid Holdup in Slurry Bubble Columns[J]. Chin. J. Process Eng., 2018, 18(2): 258-264.

参考文献

[1]Grevskott S, Sann?s B H, Dudukovi? M P, et al.Liquid circulation,bubble size distributions,and solids movement in two- and three-phase bubble columns[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 1996, 51(10):1703-1713
[2]Michele V, Hempel D C.Liquid flow and phase holdup—measurement and CFD modeling for two-and three-phase bubble columns[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 2002, 57(11):1899-1908
[3]Troshko A A, Zdravistch F.CFD modeling of slurry bubble column reactors for Fisher–Tropsch synthesis[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 2009, 64(5):892-903
[4]Feng W, Wen J, Fan J, et al.Local hydrodynamics of gas–liquid-nanoparticles three-phase fluidization[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, 60(24):6887-6898
[5]Rados N.Slurry bubble column hydrodynamics[M]. 2003.
[6]Li W, Zhong W.CFD simulation of hydrodynamics of gas–liquid–solid three-phase bubble column[J]. Powder Technology, 2015, 286:766-788.[J].Powder Technology, 2015, 286:766-788
[7]Gandhi B, Prakash A, Bergougnou M A.Hydrodynamic behavior of slurry bubble column at high solids concentrations[J].Powder Technology, 1999, 103(2):80-94
[8]Rampure M R, Buwa V V, Ranade V V.Modelling of Gas-LiquidGas-Liquid-Solid Flows in Bubble Columns: Experiments and CFD Simulations[J].Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2010, 81(3-4):692-706
[9]Mitra-Majumdar D, Farouk B, Shah Y T.Hydrodynamic modeling of three-phase flows through a vertical column[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 1997, 52(24):4485-4497
[10]Zhou R, Yang N, Li J.CFD simulation of gas-liquid-solid flow in slurry bubble columns with EMMS drag model[J]. Powder Technology, 2016.[J].Powder Technology, 2016, 314:466-479
[11]Yang N.Chapter Five – Mesoscale Transport Phenomena and Mechanisms in Gas–Liquid Reaction Systems[J]. Advances in Chemical Engineering, 2015, 46:245-280.[J].Advances in Chemical Engineering, 2015, 46:245-280
[12]Yang N, Chen J, Zhao H, et al.Explorations on the multi-scale flow structure and stability condition in bubble columns[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 2007, 62(24):6978-6991
[13]Yang N, Wu Z, Chen J, et al.Multi-scale analysis of gas-liquid interaction and CFD simulation of gas-liquid flow in bubble columns[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66(14):3212-3222
[14]Xiao Q, Yang N, Li J.Stability-constrained multi-fluid CFD models for gas-liquid flow in bubble columns[J].Chemical Engineeringence, 2013, 100(100):279-292
[15]Panneerselvam R, Savithri S, Surender G D.CFD modeling of gas–liquid–solid mechanically agitated contactor[J].Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2008, 86(12):1331-1344
[16]Gidaspow D, Bezburuah R, Ding J.Hydrodynamics of Circulating Fluidized Beds: Kinetic Theory Approach[J]. Engineering, 1991.[J].Engineering, 1992, :75-82
[17]Brucato A, Grisafi F, Montante G.Particle drag coefficients in turbulent fluids[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 1998, 53(18):3295-3314
[18]Schiller L, Naumann Z.A drag coefficient correlation[J]. 1935, 77.[J].VDI Zeitung, 1935, 77:318-320
[19]Ljungqvist M, Rasmuson A.Numerical Simulation of the Two-Phase Flow in an Axially Stirred Vessel[J].Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2001, 79(5):533-546
[20]Rafique M, Chen P, Dudukovi? M P.Computational modeling of gas-liquid flow in bubble columns[J].Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 2004, 20(3-4):225-375
[21]Hooshyar N, van Ommen J R, Hamersma P J, et al.Dynamics of single rising bubbles in neutrally buoyant liquid-solid suspensions[J].Physical Review Letters, 2013, 110(110):244501-244501
[22]Wen C Y, Yu Y H.Mechanics of Fluidization[J]. Chem.engng Prog.symp.ser, 1966, 62:100-111.[J].Chemical Engineering Progress, Symposium Series, 1966, 62(1):100-111
[23]Ergun S.Fluid flow through packed columns[J].Journal of Materials Science & Chemical Engineering, 1952, 48(2):89-94

浆态床内固含率轴向分布的数值模拟

Simulation of Axial Solid Holdup in Slurry Bubble Columns

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	徐胜楠刘宏斐李雪良堵国成陈坚. 鼓泡塔细胞反应器流体力学与传质特性[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(9): 1192-1202.
[2]	陈毕清管小平杨宁白丁荣. 搅拌槽中酯化反应热失控的CFD模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(8): 1053-1060.
[3]	胡涛向星葛蔚王利民. 基于多GPU并行格子Boltzmann方法的方管湍流模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(3): 318-328.
[4]	刘洋郭中山赵元琪管小平杨宁. 洗涤冷却室气液两相流的模拟及结构优化[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(1): 32-40.
[5]	许飞陈飞国刘晓星吴昊鲁波娜刘志成滕加伟. 烯烃催化裂解反应器局部颗粒堆积结构的颗粒解析模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 21(12): 1419-1429.
[6]	赵一鸣李浩然刘明昊胡大鹏. 气波引射器反馈结构的功能机理及性能实验[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 21(12): 1451-1462.
[7]	廖俊华薛鹏赵梦静刘俊杰金玲. 波纹板填料表面液体降膜流动的特性分析[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 21(11): 1287-1296.
[8]	史怡坤李瑞江朱学栋方海灿朱子彬. 真空变压吸附制氧径向流吸附器的流动特性模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 21(1): 18-26.
[9]	屈雪婧安敏管小平杨宁孙国刚. 气液鼓泡塔的CFD-PBM耦合模拟：离散法与QMOM方法的对比[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(7): 788-797.
[10]	薛沚怡钱付平朱景晶董伟韩云龙鲁进利. 高湿黏性颗粒在聚四氟乙烯微孔膜滤料表面沉积特性的数值模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(5): 521-530.
[11]	沈文豪张亚新宋江. 基于CFD-DEM方法的净化器流场模拟与结构优化[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(10): 1147-1155.
[12]	张旭李明凯陆平白芳周川华超. 缠绕管式换热器的CFD优化[J]. 过程工程学报, 2019, 19(4): 693-703.
[13]	陈鑫肖颀管小平杨宁. 内置涡流发生器的管内过冷沸腾与强化换热的模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2019, 19(3): 524-532.
[14]	杨帅赵祥迪徐银谋王正袁纪武孙万付. 文丘里洗涤器内硫化氢气体碱液吸收过程的CFD模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2018, 18(S1): 103-110.
[15]	王晓赞姜勇李飞王维. 基于MP-PIC方法改进EMMS/DP曳力模型[J]. 过程工程学报, 2018, 18(6): 1187-1197.