温度和停留时间对煤热解挥发分二次反应的影响

doi:10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.217192

过程工程学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1): 140-147.DOI: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.217192

温度和停留时间对煤热解挥发分二次反应的影响

敦启孟^1,2，陈兆辉²，皇甫林²，周杨²，余剑²，高士秋^2*，刘鸿雁^1*

1. 河北工业大学化工学院，天津 300130；2. 中国科学院过程工程研究所多相复杂系统国家重点实验室，北京 100190

收稿日期:2017-03-24 修回日期:2017-05-11 出版日期:2018-02-22 发布日期:2018-01-29
通讯作者: 刘鸿雁 liuhongyanyan@sina.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划资助项目

Influences of Temperature and Residence Time on Secondary Reactions of Volatiles from Coal Pyrolysis

Qimeng DUN^1,2, Zhaohui CHEN², Fulin HUANG², Yang ZHOU², Jian YU², Shiqiu GAO^2*, Hongyan LIU^1*

1. School of Chemical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Multi-phase Complex Systems, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Received:2017-03-24 Revised:2017-05-11 Online:2018-02-22 Published:2018-01-29
Contact: Hongyan N/ALiu liuhongyanyan@sina.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在两段固定床反应器中考察了温度和停留时间对煤热解挥发分二次反应产物分布的影响. 结果表明，温度和停留时间对二次反应的影响相互关联. 温度≤600℃、停留时间小于2 s时，挥发分基本不发生气相二次反应. 随温度升高和停留时间延长，挥发分二次反应加剧，焦油产率下降，气体产率和积碳产率增加. 温度低于700℃时，焦油主要转化为气体产物，气相二次反应由二次裂解反应控制；高于700℃时，焦油转化为气体和积碳，气相二次反应由裂解反应和结焦反应共同控制. 提高二次反应温度和延长停留时间，热解气中的H2, CH4和CO产率增加，CO2产率减少，焦油中杂原子化合物及其中的酚、甲酚和二甲酚产率降低，大于3环的重质多环芳烃(PAHs)产率增加，H/C和O/C原子比降低，特别是在900℃时，随停留时间延长，H2和重质PAHs产率快速增加.

关键词: 煤热解, 挥发分, 二次反应, 温度, 停留时间, 积碳

Abstract: The influences of temperature and residence time on secondary reactions of coal pyrolysis volatiles were investigated in a dual-stage fixed bed reactor. The results showed that the effects of temperature and residence time on secondary reactions are closely related. The secondary reactions of volatiles hardly occurred in general at the secondary reaction temperature≤600℃ and under residence time 2 s. The tar yield decreased while corresponding gas and deposited carbon yields increased by increasing temperature and residence time due to the intensified secondary reaction of volatiles. At lower temperature (below 700℃), the tar mainly converted into gas product by secondary cracking of tar. At higher temperature (above 700℃), the tar transformed into gas and deposited carbon products by the secondary cracking and coking of tar. With the increase of the temperature and the residence time of secondary reactions, the yields of H2, CH4 and CO increased while CO2 yield decreased, and also lead to the increase of the heavy PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of more than 3 ring) and the decrease of the phenol, cresol, xylenol and atom ratio of H/C and O/C. Especially at 900℃, the yields of H2 and heavy PAHs increased rapidly with increasing the residence time, due to the occurrence of the violent condensation reactions among aromatic rings.

Key words: coal pyrolysis, volatiles, secondary reaction, temperature, residence time, deposited carbon

敦启孟陈兆辉皇甫林周杨余剑高士秋刘鸿雁. 温度和停留时间对煤热解挥发分二次反应的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2018, 18(1): 140-147.

Qimeng DUN Zhaohui CHEN Fulin HUANG Yang ZHOU Jian YU Shiqiu GAO Hongyan LIU. Influences of Temperature and Residence Time on Secondary Reactions of Volatiles from Coal Pyrolysis[J]. Chin. J. Process Eng., 2018, 18(1): 140-147.

参考文献

[1]Liu Z Y, Guo X J, Shi L, et al.Reaction of Volatiles–a Crucial Step in Pyrolysis of Coals[J].Fuel, 2015, 154(8):361-369
[2]Chen Z H, Shi Y, Lai D G, et al.Coal Rapid Pyrolysis in a Transport Bed under Steam-Containing Syngas Atmosphere Relevant to the Integrated Fluidized Bed Gasification[J].fuel, 2016, 176:200-208
[3]刘振宇.煤快速热解制油技术问题的化学反应工程根源: 逆向传热与传质[J].化工学报, 2016, 67(1):1-5
LIU Z Y.Origin of Common Problems in Fast Coal Pyrolysis Technologies for Tar: the Countercurrent Flow of Heat and Volatiles[J].Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering, 2016, 67(1):1-5
[4]Xu W C, Tomita A.The Effects of Temperature and Residence Time on the Secondary Reactions of Volatiles from Coal Pyrolysis[J].Fuel Processing Technology, 1989, 21(1):25-37
[6]Katheklakis I E, Lu S L, Bartle K D, et al.Effect of Freeboard Residence Time on the Molecular Mass Distributions of Fluidized Bed Pyrolysis Tars[J].Fuel, 1990, 69(2):172-1763
[7]Hayashi J, Nakagawa K, Kusakabe K, et al.Change in Molecular Structure of Flash Pyrolysis Tar by Secondary Reaction in a Fluidized Bed Reactor[J].Fuel Processing Technology, 1992, 30(3):237-248
[8]李海滨，杨之媛，吕红，等.煤在流化床中的热解，: 稀相段温度和停留时间对气体产物组成的影响[J].燃料化学学报, 1998, 26(4):389-344
[9]Li H B, Yang Z Y, Lü H, et al.Pyrolysis of Coal in a Fluidized Bed Reactor,ⅡEffects of Temperature and Residence Time in Freeboard on Gaseous Product Composition[J].Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 1998, 26(4):389-344
[10]陈昭睿，王勤辉，郭志航，等.热解气停留时间对典型烟煤热解产物的影响[J].热能动力工程, 2015, 30(5):756-761
[11]Chen Z R, Wang Q H, Guo Z H, et al.Influence of the Residence Time of Gases Pyrolyzed on the Pyrolytic Products of Typical Bituminous Coal[J].Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2015, 30(5):756-7611
[12]Tyler R J.Flash Pyrolysis of CoalsDevolatilization of Bituminous Coals in a Small Fluidized-Bed Reactor[J].Fuel, 1980, 59(4):218-226
[13]石振，成帅，陈兆辉，等.神木烟煤热解产物分布及主要元素的迁移规律[J].过程工程学报, 2016, 16(5):802-811
[14]Shi Z, Cheng S, Chen Z H, et al.Distribution of Products and Migration of Main Elements during Pyrolysis of Shenmu Bituminous Coal[J].The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 2016, 16(5):802-811
[15]Li C, Suzuki K.Tar Property,Analysis,Reforming Mechanism and Model for Biomass Gasification–an Overview[J].Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13(3):594-604
[16]Tursun Y, Xu S P, Wang G Y, et al.Tar Formation during CO–Gasification of Biomass and Coal under Different Gasification Condition [J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis[J].Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2015, 111:191-199
[17]Xu W C, Tomita A.Effect of Temperature on the Flash Pyrolysis of Various Coals[J].Fuel, 1987, 66(5):632-636
[18]Chen Z H, Dun Q M, Shi Y, et al.High Quality Syngas Production from Catalytic Coal Gasification Using Disposable Ca(OH)2 Catalyst[J].Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 316:842-849
[19]Sada E, Kumazawa H, Kudsy M.Pyrolysis of Lignins in Molten Salt Media[J].Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1992, 31(2):612-616
[20]Mahadevan R, Adhikari S, Shakya R, et al.Effect of Alkali and Alkaline Earth Metals on in-Situ Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass: a Microreactor Study[J].Energy & Fuels, 2016, 30(4):3045-3056
[21]Jamil K, Hayashi J, Li C Z.Pyrolysis of a Victorian Brown Coal and Gasification of Nascent Char in CO2 Atmosphere in a Wire-mesh Reactor [J]. Fuel, 2004, 83: 833-843.[J].fuel, 2004, 83:833-843
[22]Gao S P, ZHAO J T, Wang Z Q, et al.Effect of CO2 on Pyrolysis Behaviors of Lignite[J].Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2013, 41(3):257-264
[23]李海滨，房倚天，王洋，等.二次反应对煤热解产品组成的影响[J].化学工业与工程, 1997, 14(4):45-51
[24]Li H b, Fang Y T, Wang Y, et al.The Effects of Secondary Reaction on the Product Composition of Coal Pyrolysis [J].. 1997, 14(4): 45-51.[J].Chemical Industry and Engineering, 1997, 14:45-51
[25]庄叔贤，季明荣.酚在上的吸附与分解[J].化学物理学报, 1994, 7(6):558-565
[26]Zhuang S X, Ji M R.Adsorption and Decomposition of Phenol on Pd(110)Surface[J].Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics, 1994, 7(60):558-565
[27]Campbell J H, Koskinas G J, Stout N D, et al.Kinetics of Oil Generation from Colorado Oil Shale[J].Fuel, 1978, 57(6):372-6
[28]陈兆辉，敦启孟，石勇，等.热解温度和反应气氛对输送床煤快速热解的影响[J].化工学报, 2017, 68(4):1566-1573
[29]Chen Z H, Dun Q M, Shi Y, et al.Effects of Pyrolysis Temperature and Atmosphere on Rapid Coal Pyrolysis in a Transport Bed Reactor[J].Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering, 2017, 68(4):1566-1573
[30]陈兆辉.复合流化床低阶煤气化耦合热解制备富甲烷合成气和焦油 [D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2016.
[31]Chen Z H.Production of Methane–rich Syngas and Tar from Low–rank Coals by Coupling Pyrolysis and Gasification in an Integrated Fluidized Bed [D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2016.

[1]	熊桂龙苏文康王安奇王一泽. 颗粒形状对包衣设备内药片颗粒运动特性影响的数值模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(9): 1232-1243.
[2]	蔡铖张海燕王英付海阔黄玲唐仁衡肖方明. 锂离子电池高镍三元正极材料LiNi_0.8Co_0.1Mn_0.1O₂的性能研究[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(6): 754-763.
[3]	陈德敏刘莹惠陆彪汤凯王索军陈光. 层流冷却传热系数对金属物料温度场的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 21(9): 1033-1041.
[4]	陈冠益邱旭辉郭倩倩李健刘彬旦增颜蓓蓓董磊张兆玲. 含水率及温度对中药渣热解特性影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 21(9): 1108-1116.
[5]	陈子豪, 张可, 付锡彬, 李昭东, 张熹, 章小峰, 孙新军, 钱健清. V含量对Ti-V复合微合金钢组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 21(7): 827-835.
[6]	万琼任迎春赵志啸张新艳王文静郝婧羽黎璇鞠恺. 温度/pH双响应硝化菌凝胶球的制备及特性研究[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 21(11): 1346-1354.
[7]	高章帆范沐易黄卫星邹雄刘少北. 折流板设备中流体停留时间分布与流动形态的对比研究[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 21(11): 1269-1276.
[8]	张智亮陈海军牟沛李安军李文军. 油气工况下提升管出口旋流快分系统性能的数值研究[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 21(11): 1277-1286.
[9]	赵建忠高强杨栋张驰. 近冰点多孔介质中甲烷水合物生成的温度敏感性[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 21(11): 1355-1363.
[10]	岳高伟万重重王路李彦兵. 玻璃钢化淬冷降温特征及影响因素[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(8): 947-958.
[11]	闫子涵许峻范怡平卢春喜. 喷嘴射流在气固提升管内的扩散和混合行为[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(7): 798-806.
[12]	胡颖尹雪峰常和冯雪岩王泽佳郝雪晖郭志娟. 化学链燃烧中载氧体磨损和产生积碳的机制及抑制方法[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(5): 493-502.
[13]	王娟李军高助威何星晨邹槊万加亿. 热风混合器内部流场的数值模拟与结构改进[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(2): 148-157.
[14]	陈伟管艳梅刘开伟胡普华孙道胜. 热处理温度对磷渣-煤矸石微晶玻璃结构和性能的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2019, 19(2): 370-376.
[15]	王力军段叔平徐凌锋孙嘉君. 柱形流化床传热特性的数值模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2019, 19(1): 110-117.

温度和停留时间对煤热解挥发分二次反应的影响

Influences of Temperature and Residence Time on Secondary Reactions of Volatiles from Coal Pyrolysis

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics