基于响应面法的折流板除雾器分离性能优化

doi:10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.217369

过程工程学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4): 689-696.DOI: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.217369

基于响应面法的折流板除雾器分离性能优化

马巍威1,3，吴小林1,3，姬忠礼2,3*

1. 中国石油大学(北京)化学工程学院，北京 102249
2. 中国石油大学(北京)机械与储运工程学院，北京 102249
3. 过程流体过滤与分离技术北京市重点实验室，北京 102249

收稿日期:2017-10-18 修回日期:2018-01-15 出版日期:2018-08-22 发布日期:2018-08-15
通讯作者: 姬忠礼
基金资助:
基于熵产理论的旋风分离器气固分离性能研究

Separation performance optimization of wave-plate mist eliminator based on response surface methodology

Weiwei MA1,3, Xiaolin WU1,3, Zhongli JI2,3*

1. College of Chemical Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
2. College of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
3. Beijing Key Laboratory of Process Fluid Filtration and Separation, Beijing 102249, China

Received:2017-10-18 Revised:2018-01-15 Online:2018-08-22 Published:2018-08-15
Contact: JI Zhong-li

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 用响应面分析法分析不同排液结构对新式异型折流板除雾器气液分离性能的影响，并对排液结构参数进行优化设计. 通过单因素实验对比筛选对除雾器性能具有显著影响的关键参数，用中心复合设计实验建立响应面多元回归模型，分析影响除雾器性能系数的参数间交互作用，得出最优参数. 结果表明，影响除雾器性能参数的最优取值为分离气速2.6 m/s、排液钩高度7.3 mm、前置排液槽和后置排液槽宽度分别为3.1和2.3 mm. 优化的折流板除雾器性能系数计算值为2.073，实验值为1.875，优化结果较可靠.

关键词: 折流板除雾器, 响应面法, 分离性能, 性能系数, 优化设计

Abstract: The influences of different drainage structures on the gas?liquid separation performance of wave-plate mist eliminator were analyzed and the parameters of drainage structure were optimized by response surface methodology. The single factor experiment was used to select the key parameters which had significant influence on the performance of the mist eliminator. The multivariate regression model was established using center compound design experiment in order to analyz the interaction of parameters which had influence on mist eliminator performance coefficient. The results showed that the key parameters which had significant influence on the performance of the mist eliminator and their values were separation gas velocity 2.6 m/s, height of drainage hook 7.3 mm, width of front-drainage pocket 3.1 mm and width of rear-drainage pocket 2.3 mm. The calculated value of mist eliminator performance coefficient was 2.073 while the test value was 1.875 which indicated that the optimization result of response surface methodology was credible.

Key words: wave-plate mist eliminator, response surface methodology, separation performance, performance coefficient, optimization design

马巍威吴小林姬忠礼. 基于响应面法的折流板除雾器分离性能优化[J]. 过程工程学报, 2018, 18(4): 689-696.

Weiwei MA Xiaolin WU Zhongli JI. Separation performance optimization of wave-plate mist eliminator based on response surface methodology[J]. Chin. J. Process Eng., 2018, 18(4): 689-696.

参考文献

[1] 李嘉. 波形板汽水分离器的理论与实验研究[D]. 华中科技大学, 2007.
LI J, HUANG S Y, WANG X M, et al. Experimental Research of Cold State Operation of Corrugated-plate Separator[J]. J. Huazhong Univ. of Sci. &Tech. (Natural Science Edition), 2008, 36(1): 112-114.

[2] 夏芃力, 杨静. 折流板式除沫器性能分析及研究进展[J]. 化工设备与管道, 2013, 50(6):33-36.
XIA P L, YANG J. Performance Analysis and Research Progress of Wave-plate Demister[J]. Process Equipment & Piping, 2013, 50(6): 33-36.

[3] Houghton, H.G., Radford, W.H., 1939. Measurements on Eliminators and the Development of a New Type for Use at High Gas Velocities. Trans. Am. Chem. Eng. 35, 427–433.

[4] Mcnulty K J, Monat J P, Hansen O V. Performance of Commercial Chevron Mist Eliminators[J]. Chemical Engineering Progress, 1987.

[5] Burkholz, A., Muschelknautz, E., 1972. Tropfenabscheider. Chem. Ing. Tech. 44 (8), 503–509.

[6] W?rrlein D I K. Druckverlust und Fraktionsabscheidegrad in periodisch gewinkelten Kan?len ohne Einbauten[J]. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 1975, 47(16):687-687.

[7] Ushiki K, Nishizawa E, Beniko H, et al. Performance of a Droplet Separator with Multistage Rows of Flat Blades.[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 1982, 15(4):292-298.

[8] 刘丽艳, 杨静, 孔庆森,等. 折板除沫器流场与分离效率的数值模拟[J]. 天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版), 2013(8):755-761.
LIU L Y, YANG J, KONG Q L, et al. Numerical Simulations of Flow Field and Separation Efficiency for Wave-Plate Mist Eliminator[J]. Journal of Tianjin University (Science and Technology), 2013, 46(8): 755-761.

[9] Azzopardi B J, Sanaullah K S. Re-entrainment in Wave-plate Mist Eliminators[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2002, 57(17):3557-3563.

[10] James P W, Wang Y, Azzopardi B J, et al. The Role of Drainage Channels in the Performance of Wave-Plate Mist Eliminators[J]. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2003, 81(6):639-648.

[11] Kavousi F, Behjat Y, Shahhosseini S. Optimal Design of Drainage Channel Geometry Parameters in Vane Demister Liquid–gas Separators[J]. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2013, 91(7):1212-1222.

[12] 臧丽叶, 田瑞峰, 孙兰昕,等. 横掠气流作用下波形板壁降膜破裂分析[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(3):862-869.
ZANG L Y, TIAN R F, SUN L X, et al. Breakdown of Liquid Films Driven by Horizontal Gas Flow in Wave-plate Channel[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(3):862-869

[13] 赵健植, 金保升, 仲兆平,等. 基于响应曲面法的除雾器叶片效率模拟[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2007, 27(23):61-65.
ZHAO J Z, JIN B S, ZHONG Z P, et al. Simulation Study of Separation Efficiency of Demister Vane Based on Response Surface Methodology[J]. Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2007, 27(23):61-65.

[14] Venkatesan G, Kulasekharan N, Iniyan S. Design and Selection of Curved Vane Demisters Using Taguchi Based CFD Analysis[J]. Desalination, 2014, 354:39-52.

[15] Venkatesan G, Kulasekharan N, Iniyan S. Numerical Analysis of Curved Vane Demisters in Estimating Water Droplet Separation Efficiency[J]. Desalination, 2014, 339(339):40-53.

基于响应面法的折流板除雾器分离性能优化

Separation performance optimization of wave-plate mist eliminator based on response surface methodology

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	文康韦祎马光辉. 基于响应面法对制备高包埋率ROP-PLGA微球的影响因素分析[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 21(1): 83-91.
[2]	陶芳芳靳海波宁尚雷. 电阻层析成像技术在气液(固)多相流动体系中的应用进展[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(4): 371-381.
[3]	胡胜杰黄永东赵岚朱凯苗壮王飞晋洪超李建杨珺汪和睦马光辉袁洪水. 基于疫苗颗粒完整性的硅胶吸附/解吸附纯化重组乙肝表面抗原工艺研究[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(10): 1198-1209.
[4]	马培勇王田武晋州邢献军张贤文. 响应面法优化制备塑料-锯末活性炭[J]. 过程工程学报, 2019, 19(2): 377-386.
[5]	鲍青云韦敬柳乙姜泽东余刚黄高凌朱艳冰肖安风倪辉李清彪. 响应面法优化纤维素酶辅助从泡叶藻中提取泡叶藻聚糖的工艺[J]. 过程工程学报, 2018, 18(3): 632-638.
[6]	王博文李静静巩秋艳魏凤玉徐志强徐迎波. 氧化石墨烯辅助乙醇提取竹叶黄酮[J]. 过程工程学报, 2017, 17(4): 709-715.
[7]	王庆峰郝帅李凯李中. 基于CFD数值模拟的换热器外导流筒优化设计[J]. 过程工程学报, 2017, 17(3): 461-468.
[8]	疏志勇钱付平郭旺. 基于OpenFOAM模拟二次风对旋风分离器性能的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2017, 17(2): 217-223.
[9]	李晓霞刘有智焦纬洲余丽胜王永红. 超声制备甲醇乳化柴油影响因素的响应面法优化[J]. 过程工程学报, 2017, 17(2): 278-284.
[10]	王灿刘海波谢晶晶鲁光辉于龙庆陈天虎. 响应面法优化凹凸棒石尾矿中蛋白石制备水玻璃工艺[J]. 过程工程学报, 2017, 17(2): 382-388.
[11]	马江雅施军杨志程付雪付坤孙永军张源林. 响应面法优化PAC与CPAM复配处理模拟废水[J]. 过程工程学报, 2017, 17(1): 130-137.
[12]	郑蓓蕾林倩潘红艳刘秀娟赵敏陈政杨春亮. 响应面法优化甲烷吸附用活性炭的镍改性工艺[J]. 过程工程学报, 2016, 16(3): 431-437.
[13]	李慧芳钱付平史德明夏勇军胡笳何东洋鲁进利韩云龙. 基于成本效益法优化新型滤筒除尘器结构[J]. 过程工程学报, 2015, 15(6): 988-993.
[14]	徐婧王连艳杨婷媛刘艳辉马光辉. 聚乳酸纳米颗粒的制备与表征[J]. 过程工程学报, 2015, 15(3): 495-500.
[15]	张浩刘影刘秀玉黄新杰杜晓燕唐刚. 基于光催化降解甲醛溶液性能的Cu-Ce/TiO2制备方案的响应面法优化[J]. , 2014, 14(5): 891-895.