转炉一次除尘新OG系统高效喷淋塔喷嘴布置方式对喷淋特性的影响

doi:10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.218255

过程工程学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 500-509.DOI: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.218255

转炉一次除尘新OG系统高效喷淋塔喷嘴布置方式对喷淋特性的影响

钱付平¹,黄小萍¹,曹博文¹,夏勇军²,胡笳²,史德明²,韩云龙¹

1. 安徽工业大学建筑工程学院，安徽马鞍山 243002 2. 安徽欣创节能环保科技股份有限公司，安徽马鞍山 243071

收稿日期:2018-07-25 修回日期:2018-11-09 出版日期:2019-06-22 发布日期:2019-06-20
通讯作者: 钱付平 fpingqian@163.com
基金资助:
转炉一次除尘新OG系统性能研究及其参数优化设计

Effect of nozzle layout in high efficient spray tower of new OG system of primary dedusting system for converter on spray characteristics

Fuping QIAN^1*, Xiaoping HUANG¹, Bowen CAO¹, Yongjun XIA², Jia HU², Deming SHI², Yunlong HAN¹

1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Technology, Ma'anshan, Anhui 243002, China 2. Anhui Xinchuang Energy Saving & Environment Protection Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Ma'anshan, Anhui 243071, China

Received:2018-07-25 Revised:2018-11-09 Online:2019-06-22 Published:2019-06-20
Contact: QIAN Fu-Ping fpingqian@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用离散相模型对新OG系统高效喷淋塔入口段及主体段喷嘴的布置方式进行数值模拟，考察了喷嘴喷射方向和喷淋层数对雾化场气流分布和降温效果的影响。结果表明，喷嘴的喷射方向和塔内的喷淋层数对雾化场的气流分布和降温效果影响较大；喷淋塔入口段采用逆流喷射时，出口截面的速度分布最均匀且降温效果最好；高效喷淋塔的主体段的喷淋层数为5时，塔内烟气的速度流场较均匀，且中心区域的气流速度为2~4 m/s，有助于延长气体与液滴的作用时间；随喷淋层数增加，塔内温度梯度变化增大，水蒸气质量分数分布与温度分布对应，塔内的平均湍动能逐渐增高。

关键词: 转炉一次除尘, 新OG系统, 喷淋塔, 喷嘴布置, 数值模拟

Abstract: The nozzle layout of the high efficient spray tower in OG (Oxygen Converter Gas Recovery) system of the primary dedusting for the converter has an important role on the cooling effect and operating reliability of the spraying system. The discrete phase model was used to simulate the nozzle layout of the high efficiency spray tower. The nozzle layouts of the inlet and main section of the high efficiency spray tower were discussed, and the influence of the nozzle direction and the number of spray layers on the air distribution and cooling effect in the atomizing field were also analyzed. The results showed that the spraying direction of the nozzle and the number of spray layers in the tower had great influence on the air distribution and cooling effect of the atomization field. When the inlet section of the spray tower adopted countercurrent injection, the velocity distribution of the outlet cross section was the most uniform and the cooling effect was the best. When the number of spray layers in the main section of the high efficiency spray tower was five, the flow field of the flue gas in the tower was relatively uniform, and the velocity in the center area was in the range of 2~4 m/s, which helped to increase the time of interaction between gas and droplets. With the increase of the number of spray layers, the temperature gradient in the tower also increased and the distributions of water vapor mass fraction and temperature correspond to each other, and then the average turbulent energy in the tower also gradually increased. Through the above research, the reasonable arrangement of nozzle in the high efficiency spray tower was obtained. The results can provide a theoretical basis for the optimization and improvement of the high efficiency spray tower in the new OG system.

Key words: primary dedusting system for converter, new OG system, spray tower, nozzle layout, numerical simulation

钱付平黄小萍曹博文夏勇军胡笳史德明韩云龙. 转炉一次除尘新OG系统高效喷淋塔喷嘴布置方式对喷淋特性的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2019, 19(3): 500-509.

Fuping QIAN Xiaoping HUANG Bowen CAO Yongjun XIA Jia HU Deming SHI Yunlong HAN. Effect of nozzle layout in high efficient spray tower of new OG system of primary dedusting system for converter on spray characteristics[J]. Chin. J. Process Eng., 2019, 19(3): 500-509.

参考文献

[1]马春生.转炉烟气净化与回收工艺[J].北京冶金工业出版社, 2014, :113-117.

[2]闫武装, 周景伟.国内转炉除尘技术介绍及趋势分析[J].冶金设备, 2017, 1(236):126-128.

[3]Li S, Zheng M, Liu W, et al.Estimation and characterization of unintentionally produced persistent organic pollutant emission from converter steelmaking processes[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2014, 21(12):7361-7368.

[4]吕平.转炉烟气治理技术现状及展望[J].冶金丛刊, 2016, :28-31.

[5]祝杰, 吴振元, 叶世超, 等.喷淋塔液滴粒径分布及比表面积的实验研究[J].化工学报, 2014, 65(12):4709-4715.

[6]祝杰, 吴振元, 叶世超, 等.喷淋塔传质特性的实验与模型研究[J].环境工程学报, 2015, 9(01):317-322.

[7]Liu D, Chen B, Zhang B.Numerical simulation of the two-phase fluid field in a gas-around-liquid spray nozzle[J].Chemical Engineering and Technology, 2013, 36(3):450-458.

[8]李睿, 苏伟, 宋存义, 等.烟气脱硫卧式喷淋塔的数值模拟[J].环境工程学报, 2016, 10(10):5798-5802.

[9]田海军, 邢奕, 宋存义, 等.卧式喷淋塔烟气脱硫的数值模拟[J].工程科学学报, 2018, 40(01):17-22.

[10]林瑜, 陈德珍, 尹丽洁.喷淋层组合方式对大型脱硫塔内流动和热湿交换过程影响的数值模拟[J].中南大学学报, 2017, 48(10):2572-2582.

[11]Tseng C C, Li C J.Numerical investigation of the inertial loss coefficient and the porous media model for the flow through the perforated sieve tray[J].Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2016, 106:126-140.

[12]Marocco L.Modeling of the fluid dynamics and SO2 absorption in a gas-liquid reactor[J].Chemical Engineering Journal, 2010, 162(1):217-226.

[13]Marocco L, Mora A.CFD modeling of the Dry-Sorbent-Injection process for flue gas desulfurization using hydrated lime[J].Separation and Purification Technology, 2013, 108(16):205-214.

[14]Codolo M, Bizzo W, Bertazzoli R.Performance of a UV assisted hydrogen-peroxide-fed spray tower for sulfur dioxide abatement[J].Chemical Engineering and Technology, 2013, 36(7):1255-1260.

[15]祝杰, 吴振元, 叶世超, 等.石灰石-石膏湿法喷淋脱硫模型研究[J].高校化学工程学报, 2015, 29(01):220-225.

[16]黄小萍，钱付平，王来勇，等.转炉一次除尘新系统高效喷淋塔喷嘴雾化特性的模拟[J].过程工程学报, 2018, 18(3):461-468.

[17]Ahsan M.Numerical analysis of friction factor for a fully developed turbulent flow using k-ε turbulence model with enhanced wall treatment[J].Beni-suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 2014, 3(4):1-9.

[18]王福军.计算流体动力学分析—CFD软件原理与应用[J].北京清华大学出版社, 2004.

[19]Qin C, Loth E.Numerical Description of a Pressure-swirl Nozzle Spray[J].Chemical Engineering & Processing Process Intensification, 2016, 107:68-79.

[20]陈曦, 葛少成, 张忠温, 等.基于多喷嘴喷雾干涉数值模拟分析[J].环境工程学报, 2014, 8(6):2503-2508.

转炉一次除尘新OG系统高效喷淋塔喷嘴布置方式对喷淋特性的影响

Effect of nozzle layout in high efficient spray tower of new OG system of primary dedusting system for converter on spray characteristics

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	高华鑫刘雪东张炜查晓峰吕圣男刘佳君吕开新. 新型热解炉燃烧室流热固耦合仿真与结构优化[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(9): 1203-1212.
[2]	田玉龙杨秀山孔行健许德华张志业. 磷石膏颗粒湍动流化特性实验及模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(9): 1224-1231.
[3]	熊桂龙苏文康王安奇王一泽. 颗粒形状对包衣设备内药片颗粒运动特性影响的数值模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(9): 1232-1243.
[4]	张建伟牛聚超董鑫冯颖. 撞击流反应器流场数值模拟及其混合性能优化[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(9): 1244-1252.
[5]	张静王胜昌田志国吴剑华龚斌. 周向多入口凹壁面切向射流流动特性分析[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(8): 1030-1039.
[6]	靳波张亚新. 颗粒尺度下混合催化剂床层中CO₂加氢反应体系数值模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(8): 1040-1052.
[7]	段怡如李宝宽黄雪驰刘中秋柴玉莹. 电渣重熔H13模具钢过程碳偏析的模拟研究[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(8): 1074-1084.
[8]	王翠华李光瑜苏方正龚斌吴剑华. 螺旋套管换热器壳程流体湍流换热热力性能数值研究[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(7): 935-943.
[9]	张炜刘文津张玉明李家州岳君容. 高温加压微型流化床内脉冲气射流扰动的数值模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(7): 944-953.
[10]	李倩吉华冯东林张子扬段宗幸. 孔分布对多孔孔板流场和噪声的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(5): 601-611.
[11]	李雅侠许鹏宇韩泽民李运杭崔峰源张静. 矩形截面高宽比对射流强化螺旋通道传热性能的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(5): 612-621.
[12]	胡涛向星葛蔚王利民. 基于多GPU并行格子Boltzmann方法的方管湍流模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(3): 318-328.
[13]	周里群王智明汪振南李玉平黄治中. 三级活塞推料离心机数值模拟与操作参数优化[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(3): 329-337.
[14]	郑淑国朱苗勇. 250 t转炉二次燃烧氧枪射流特性[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(10): 1438-1446.
[15]	刘彪姚秀颖孟振亮刘梦溪. 高低并列式重油催化裂化汽提器挡板的结构优化[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(1): 22-31.